TPI Senior Fellow and President Emeritus Thomas M. Lenard Submits Comments on the FCC’s Technological Advisory Council Spectrum Policy Recommendations

TPI Senior Fellow and President Emeritus Thomas M. Lenard Submits Comments on the FCC’s Technological Advisory Council Spectrum Policy Recommendations

Comments emphasize a flexible, market-based system for spectrum allocation

January 31, 2018 – Thomas M. Lenard, Senior Fellow and President Emeritus of the Technology Policy Institute (TPI) today submitted comments to the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Technological Advisory Council on their Spectrum Policy Recommendations. The Technical Advisory Council (TAC) is seeking ways to manage and mitigate spectrum interference and held a 60-day open public comment period to seek input on its proposed policy recommendations. In his comments, Dr. Lenard argues that flexible, market-based approaches to spectrum allocation are in the best interests of both the U.S. economy as well as for American consumers.

“The central problem in the management of spectrum is interference, which the TAC policy recommendations are designed to address,” Dr. Lenard states. “We would expect a flexible, market-based system to provide the best incentives to address interference problems in a cost-effective manner and to promote efficient use of the spectrum.”

Dr. Lenard further states that, “while mitigating interference and its effects in real time is a technological issue, truly dealing with the problem in a longer-term, more robust way requires thinking about it as an economics and incentives problem.” He argues that spectrum policy should maximize the value or net social benefits of spectrum use, which generally involves minimizing the sum of relevant spectrum-related costs. “Although not stated in those terms, the TAC’s spectrum policy recommendations generally appear to be guided by a cost-benefit balancing framework that would minimize interference-related costs.” Several of the TAC principles, for example, focus on the shared role of transmitters and receivers, which is important for addressing interference problems in a cost-effective manner. Another TAC principle cautions that the benefits will not realistically outweigh the costs of mitigating service degradation from exceptional events.

For more information on the FCC’s Technological Advisory Council’s Spectrum Policy Recommendations – including Dr. Lenard’s submitted comments, please go here.

Contact: Chris McGurn, 202-445-0820, [email protected]

The Technology Policy Institute

The Technology Policy Institute is a non-profit research and educational organization that focuses on the economics of innovation, technological change, and related regulation in the United States and around the world. More information is available at https://techpolicyinstitute.org/.

+ posts

Share This Article

View More Publications by

Recommended Reads

The FCC’s New Wireless Competition Report: The Right Way to Look at the Industry

Satellite Broadband: Line-of-Sight, Not Out of Mind

Net Neutrality Regulation’s First Target: Small Wireless Competitors?

Explore More Topics

Antitrust and Competition 181
Artificial Intelligence 33
Big Data 21
Blockchain 29
Broadband 382
China 2
Content Moderation 15
Economics and Methods 36
Economics of Digitization 15
Evidence-Based Policy 18
Free Speech 20
Infrastructure 1
Innovation 2
Intellectual Property 56
Miscellaneous 334
Privacy and Security 137
Regulation 12
Trade 2
Uncategorized 4

Related Articles

Advanced Spectrum Policy Primer

BEAD’s Bidding for Broadband: Why Williamson’s 1976 Analysis Still Matters

DOGE Should Focus On Wasted Federal Spectrum

Spectrum Policy 2025: Insights from TPI’s Winter Series

International Spectrum Leadership: Key takeaways

The 2025 Spectrum Agenda: Key Takeaways

Federal Spectrum Valuation, Management, and Reform: Key Takeaways

Commercial Space and Spectrum Access: Key Takeaways

Sign Up for Updates

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.