USF Reform Should Include Low-Income Subsides, Competitive Auctions

USF Reform Should Include Low-Income Subsides, Competitive Auctions

Wallsten, Rosston Urge Experimentation in Transitioning USF to Broadband

Contact: Amy Smorodin
(202) 828-4405

April 18, 2011 – Transitioning the use of universal service funds to subsidize broadband creates a unique opportunity to reform the program. Reforms should include a focus on low-income subsides and competitive bidding in high-cost service areas, explain Scott Wallsten and Gregory Rosston in “The Path to Universal Broadband: Why We Should Grant Low-Income Subsides, and Use Auctions and Experiments to Determine the Specifics” recently published by The Economists’ Voice.

In the article, Wallsten, TPI Senior Fellow and Vice President for Research, and Rosston, Deputy Director of the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, explain that the current USF program “is inefficient in both its collection mechanisms and in what it supports.” Therefore, focusing support on buildout of wired broadband in high-cost areas would fail to significantly raise penetration rates because many people who place a high value on internet access already subscribe to a satellite broadband service. Instead, adoption rates could be increased by focusing on low-income subsidies to people to whom broadband is available, but who do not currently subscribe.

Rosston and Wallsten also state that even if the fund continues to subsidize high-cost areas, firms should be allowed to compete to provide broadband service at the lowest cost. Such universal service auctions have been used successfully in other countries and should be considered a viable option for policymakers focused on USF reform.

The Path to Universal Broadband: Why We Should Grant Low-Income Subsides, and Use Auctions and Experiments to Determine the Specifics,” is available on the Economists’ Voice website.

The Technology Policy Institute

The Technology Policy Institute is a non-profit research and educational organization that focuses on the economics of innovation, technological change, and related regulation in the United States and around the world. More information is available at https://techpolicyinstitute.org/.

Website |  + posts

Share This Article

View More Publications by

Recommended Reads

Regulating the Internet

The FCC’s New Wireless Competition Report: The Right Way to Look at the Industry

The FCC Tries to Find Its Way

Explore More Topics

Antitrust and Competition 181
Artificial Intelligence 34
Big Data 21
Blockchain 29
Broadband 382
China 2
Content Moderation 15
Economics and Methods 37
Economics of Digitization 15
Evidence-Based Policy 18
Free Speech 20
Infrastructure 1
Innovation 2
Intellectual Property 56
Miscellaneous 334
Privacy and Security 137
Regulation 12
Trade 2
Uncategorized 4

Related Articles

Advanced Spectrum Policy Primer

BEAD’s Bidding for Broadband: Why Williamson’s 1976 Analysis Still Matters

New BEAD Rules Enable Efficient Spending But Make it Pointless to Try

Starlink and DOGE: The $42 Billion Conflict of Interest in Rural Broadband

DOGE Should Focus On Wasted Federal Spectrum

Spectrum Policy 2025: Insights from TPI’s Winter Series

International Spectrum Leadership: Key takeaways

The 2025 Spectrum Agenda: Key Takeaways

Sign Up for Updates

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.