COVID-19 is Narrowing the Digital Divide

COVID-19 is Narrowing the Digital Divide

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of broadband connections and the ways that not being connected can worsen inequality. While policymakers struggle to find effective methods of increasing adoption, the pandemic itself appears to have helped make some strides in closing the divide.

Specifically, based on data from the largest ISPs’ quarterly 10Q SEC filings, the upward trend in the number of fixed line connections accelerated once the pandemic began, as the figure below shows. From Q3 2011 through Q3 2019, the number of fixed connections from these companies increased at approximately a three percent annual compound growth rate. During the pandemic, from Q3 2019 through Q3 2020 (the most recent data available), the number of connections increased by about five percent.

The accelerated adoption rate could be coincidental, of course, but is likely due to increased household demand as broadband became more important for work, education, entertainment, and other aspects of daily life, as well as discounted plans and pledges from ISPs to not cut off connections for nonpayment.

None of this is meant to imply that low-income adoption and rural availability are no longer problems. They are. Instead, it simply suggests that we may emerge from the pandemic with a somewhat smaller divide than existed when the pandemic began and that we still need research to help figure out what approaches are likely to be effective in bridging the remaining divide.

+ posts

Scott Wallsten is President and Senior Fellow at the Technology Policy Institute and also a senior fellow at the Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy. He is an economist with expertise in industrial organization and public policy, and his research focuses on competition, regulation, telecommunications, the economics of digitization, and technology policy. He was the economics director for the FCC's National Broadband Plan and has been a lecturer in Stanford University’s public policy program, director of communications policy studies and senior fellow at the Progress & Freedom Foundation, a senior fellow at the AEI – Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies and a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, an economist at The World Bank, a scholar at the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, and a staff economist at the U.S. President’s Council of Economic Advisers. He holds a PhD in economics from Stanford University.

Share This Article

View More Publications by

Recommended Reads

Regulating the Internet

The FCC’s New Wireless Competition Report: The Right Way to Look at the Industry

The FCC Tries to Find Its Way

Explore More Topics

Antitrust and Competition 181
Artificial Intelligence 34
Big Data 21
Blockchain 29
Broadband 382
China 2
Content Moderation 15
Economics and Methods 36
Economics of Digitization 15
Evidence-Based Policy 18
Free Speech 20
Infrastructure 1
Innovation 2
Intellectual Property 56
Miscellaneous 334
Privacy and Security 137
Regulation 12
Trade 2
Uncategorized 4

Related Articles

Advanced Spectrum Policy Primer

BEAD’s Bidding for Broadband: Why Williamson’s 1976 Analysis Still Matters

New BEAD Rules Enable Efficient Spending But Make it Pointless to Try

Starlink and DOGE: The $42 Billion Conflict of Interest in Rural Broadband

DOGE Should Focus On Wasted Federal Spectrum

Spectrum Policy 2025: Insights from TPI’s Winter Series

International Spectrum Leadership: Key takeaways

The 2025 Spectrum Agenda: Key Takeaways

Sign Up for Updates

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.