Website Blocking Revisited: The Effect of the UK November 2014 Blocks on Consumer Behavior

Website Blocking Revisited: The Effect of the UK November 2014 Blocks on Consumer Behavior

Whether and how copyrights should be enforced in the digital age has become an important policy question and an important question for empirical research. In a prior study, we found that the court ordered blocking of the Pirate Bay website in the UK in April 2012 had only a small impact on total piracy and no impact on paid legal streaming, but that the blocking of 19 major piracy websites in November 2013 caused a significant decrease in total piracy and a significant increase in usage of paid legal streaming sites.
In this update, we ask whether the blocking of 53 piracy websites in the UK in November 2014 — which more than doubled the total number of sites being blocked in the country — had an impact on consumer behavior and how that impact compared to the previous blocks. We found that these blocks caused a 90% drop in visits to the blocked sites while causing no increase in usage of unblocked sites. This led to a 22% decrease in total piracy for all users affected by the blocks (or a 16% decrease across all users overall). We also found that these blocks caused a 6% increase in visits to paid legal streaming sites like Netflix and a 10% increase in videos viewed on legal ad-supported streaming sites like BBC and Channel 5.
The evidence suggests that blocking large numbers of sites can still “move the dial” in terms of consumer behavior, but that there may be diminishing returns as remaining pirates may be more dispersed or else have lower willingness to pay for legal content. Nonetheless, such blocks can serve to mitigate the possibility of a long-term return to the prior status quo.

 

Attachments

Website Blocking Revisited: The Effect of the UK November 2014 Blocks on Consumer Behavior

+ posts

Michael D. Smith is a Senior Adjunct Fellow at Technology Policy Institute. He is also a Professor of Information Systems and Marketing and the Co-Director of IDEA, the Initiative for Digital Entertainment Analytics at Carnegie Mellon University. He holds academic appointments at Carnegie Mellon University’s School of Information Systems and Management and the Tepper School of Business. Smith has received several notable awards including the National Science Foundation’s prestigious CAREER Research Award, and he was recently selected as one of the top 100 “emerging engineering leaders in the United States” by the National Academy of Engineering. Smith received a Bachelors of Science in Electrical Engineering (summa cum laude) and a Masters of Science in Telecommunications Science from the University of Maryland, and received a Ph.D. in Management Science from the Sloan School of Management at MIT.

Share This Article

View More Publications by

Recommended Reads

Farewell to Limewire?

Research Roundup: File-sharing vs. music sales, Craigslist vs. newspapers, and more

Blog

Internet Hysteria – Are We Losing Our Edge?

Explore More Topics

Antitrust and Competition 179
Artificial Intelligence 29
Big Data 20
Blockchain 29
Broadband 382
China 2
Content Moderation 15
Economics and Methods 35
Economics of Digitization 14
Evidence-Based Policy 18
Free Speech 19
Infrastructure 1
Innovation 2
Intellectual Property 56
Miscellaneous 334
Privacy and Security 136
Regulation 9
Trade 2
Uncategorized 4

Related Articles

TPI Aspen in Review: AI and Copyright Policy

Video Streaming and Its Lessons for Higher Education: Michael Smith on TPI’s Two Think Minimum

How a market can make vaccine patents available to the world

Protecting Privacy and Moving the Evidence Ball Down the Field with Nancy Potok

Does Pirated Video Crowd Out Non-Pirated Video? Yes—See How Much Here.

Do Pirated Video Streams Crowd Out Non-Pirated Video Streams? Evidence from Online Activity

Are eSports Winning the Content War?

“Music Licensing after the Music Modernization Act with Mitch Glazier and David Israelite” (Two Think Minimum Podcast)

Sign Up for Updates

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.