ICANN Should Move Toward Greater Private Sector Accountability

ICANN Should Move Toward Greater Private Sector Accountability

Lenard, White Cite Evidence from Comparable Organizations

Contact: Amy Smorodin
(202) 828-4405

May 19, 2011 – The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers should be more accountable to its private sector users, state Thomas Lenard and Lawrence White in “Improving ICANN’s Governance and Accountability: A Policy Proposal,” published in the latest issue of Information Economics and Policy. Instead of increased government involvement, as some have been advocating, Lenard and White recommend ICANN be governed by its direct users, the registries and registrars, as a way of improving accountability, a longstanding issue with ICANN.

In the paper, Lenard, TPI President and Senior Fellow, and White, Professor of Economics at NYU’s Stern School of Business, show that ICANN has little accountability outside of the organization itself. “Though it is a non-profit organization,” they explain, “it has no members or shareholders or donors. With its control of the Internet, it is effectively a monopolist, with an assured revenue stream from the fees that it can levy on registries and registrars.” The authors state that ICANN does have extensive notice and comment processes, but the board is under no obligation to base decisions on the outside input because members are not elected by the constituencies, and hence are not required to represent them.

Lenard and White base their recommendations on the governance structures of similar standard-setting and coordination organizations, virtually all of which are governed by their users, thereby building accountability into their structures. The authors conclude that, under a similar governance structure, ICANN “would be less likely (than under its current near-complete absence of accountability) to stray from the goal of maintaining the Internet as an efficient and dynamic network for communication and commerce.”

Improving ICANN’s Governance and Accountability: A Policy Proposal,” is available on the TPI website.

The Technology Policy Institute

The Technology Policy Institute is a non-profit research and educational organization that focuses on the economics of innovation, technological change, and related regulation in the United States and around the world. More information is available at https://techpolicyinstitute.org/.

Website |  + posts

Share This Article

View More Publications by

Recommended Reads

BLS Data, School Phone Bans, and AI’s Effects on Labor Markets, Research Roundup, May 2026

Is the Kessler Effect Overplayed in the EU Space Act?

Future of News Ratings and Media Trust with NewsGuard CEO Gordon Crovitz on Two Think Minimum

Explore More Topics

Antitrust and Competition 185
Artificial Intelligence 42
Big Data 21
Blockchain 29
Broadband 391
China 2
Content Moderation 15
Economics and Methods 37
Economics of Digitization 15
Evidence-Based Policy 18
Free Speech 22
Infrastructure 1
Innovation 2
Intellectual Property 56
Miscellaneous 335
Privacy and Security 137
Regulation 19
Trade 2
Uncategorized 5

Related Articles

TPI Aspen Forum 2026: Digital Crossroads, From Telecom to Big Tech

TPI Aspen Forum 2026: Overruling Humphrey’s Executor, The Implications for Antitrust Enforcement

TPI Aspen Forum 2026: What Are Cybersecurity’s Hardest Problems?

TPI Aspen Forum 2026: Does America Lead in Quantum?

FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson Sits Down with CNBC’s Brian Sullivan at the 2026 Aspen Forum

BLS Data, School Phone Bans, and AI’s Effects on Labor Markets, Research Roundup, May 2026

Inside the NIH w/ Jay Bhattacharya on Innovation, Replication, and mRNA Policy

Is the Kessler Effect Overplayed in the EU Space Act?

Sign Up for Updates

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.