ICANN should not Terminate Ties to the Department of Commerce argues Lenard

ICANN should not Terminate Ties to the Department of Commerce argues Lenard

February 5, 2008 – iGrowthGlobal president Thomas Lenard today filed comments with the National Telecommunications and Information Agency (NTIA) on the Midterm Review of the 2006 Joint Project Agreement (JPA) that NTIA has with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). NTIA is requesting comments on whether ICANN is making progress toward fulfilling its responsibilities under the JPA, and on the continued transition to the private sector of the technical coordination and management of the Internet’s domain name and addressing system.

Lenard said, “The fact that ICANN may be making progress toward meeting its responsibilities does not imply that the JPA is no longer needed. Indeed, it may demonstrate the value of the JPA. If ICANN’s progress is related to the JPA and the existing tie to the Department of Commerce, then terminating that arrangement would be counterproductive to continued progress.”

He added that “simply terminating the JPA is likely to lead to unanticipated and undesirable consequences. Before taking such a step, there needs to be a lot more analysis of its implications. Most importantly, there needs to be a lot more planning to develop a structure for a ‘privatized’ ICANN, providing it with the right incentives and constraints that will assure the long-term health of the Internet. The JPA should only be concluded if there is a plan in place that defines and can assure ICANN’s good performance over time.”

Lenard stated that decisions in this area are very important. “The Internet is now the main driver of the digital economy, as well as a means to communicate and distribute information more efficiently and more widely than ever before. Thus, the governance of the Internet has far-reaching economic, political and social ramifications. ICANN is a unique organization. It is a non-profit corporation under California law, but unlike literally any other non-profit, ICANN makes decisions of major economic and social consequence throughout the world.”

 

iGrowthGlobal

iGrowthGlobal is a think tank that focuses on the economics of innovation and technological change in the United States and around the world. iGG produces original, rigorous research and sponsors educational programs and conferences on major issues affecting information technology and communications policy. iGG is a 501(c)(3) research and educational organization.

Website | + posts

Share This Article

Recommended Reads

Is the Kessler Effect Overplayed in the EU Space Act?

Future of News Ratings and Media Trust with NewsGuard CEO Gordon Crovitz on Two Think Minimum

The TikTok Dilemma: Navigating the Intersection of National Security and Digital Speech 

Explore More Topics

Antitrust and Competition 193
Artificial Intelligence 50
Broadband 401
Content Moderation 15
Economics and Methods 43
Evidence-Based Policy 19
Free Speech 23
Intellectual Property 56
Miscellaneous 338
Privacy and Security 154
Regulation 30
Trade 3

View More Publications by

Related Articles

TPI Aspen Discussion Recap: The Supreme Court in an Era of Political Polarization

TPI Aspen Discussion Recap: AI Finds the Flaws. Can We Fix Them Fast Enough?

Digital Crossroads, From Telecom to Big Tech. TPI Aspen Discussion Recap

Video Now Available: Shane Greenstein on Data Center Economics from TPI Aspen

TPI Aspen 2026 Videos Now Available

TPI Aspen Forum 2026: The Supreme Court in an Era of Political Polarization

TPI Aspen Forum 2026: Meeting AI’s Power Demand: Who Pays and Who Builds

TPI Aspen Forum 2026: Digital Crossroads, From Telecom to Big Tech

SIGN UP FOR UPDATES

"(Required)" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Secret Link