How to Create a More Efficient Broadband Universal Service Program by Incorporating Demand and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

How to Create a More Efficient Broadband Universal Service Program by Incorporating Demand and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

The existing high-cost fund suffers from two inherent flaws: it does not incorporate how much consumers value the services being subsidized, and does not measure the incremental, rather than average, effects of the program. This paper proposes a way to incorporate those factors into the Connect America Fund—the proposed high-cost broadband support program—to enable it to operate more efficiently than the existing high-cost program ever could.

In particular, decisions about where to provide subsidies should be based on cost-effectiveness analyses that explicitly take into account not just the cost of providing service but also how much consumers would value the improvement in service the subsidy would bring beyond what is currently available. Incorporating this information requires conducting regular research on consumer willingness-to-pay for different levels of broadband service. This information would be used to help determine what types of service should be subsidized in unserved areas, which areas to fund, and the maximum amount that should be spent on subsidies.

Such an approach would help achieve universal service objectives in a way that provides real benefits to citizens, does not enrich particular firms, and limits total spending.

Attachments
+ posts

Scott Wallsten is President and Senior Fellow at the Technology Policy Institute and also a senior fellow at the Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy. He is an economist with expertise in industrial organization and public policy, and his research focuses on competition, regulation, telecommunications, the economics of digitization, and technology policy. He was the economics director for the FCC's National Broadband Plan and has been a lecturer in Stanford University’s public policy program, director of communications policy studies and senior fellow at the Progress & Freedom Foundation, a senior fellow at the AEI – Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies and a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, an economist at The World Bank, a scholar at the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, and a staff economist at the U.S. President’s Council of Economic Advisers. He holds a PhD in economics from Stanford University.

Share This Article

Communications

View More Publications by

Recommended Reads

TPI Comments Warn FCC Space Licensing Reforms May Worsen Congestion Without Market Mechanisms

Press Releases

TPI Proposes Market-Based Auction to Consolidate Rural Carriers and Reduce USF Costs

Press Releases

Comments filed with the Federal Communications Commission in the Matter of Space Modernization for the 21st Century

Testimony and Filings

Explore More Topics

Antitrust and Competition 182
Artificial Intelligence 36
Big Data 21
Blockchain 29
Broadband 387
China 2
Content Moderation 15
Economics and Methods 37
Economics of Digitization 15
Evidence-Based Policy 18
Free Speech 20
Infrastructure 1
Innovation 2
Intellectual Property 56
Miscellaneous 334
Privacy and Security 137
Regulation 14
Trade 2
Uncategorized 4

Related Articles

Preparing for WRC-27 Panel Recap

Why Policy Experiments Never End: Constituencies Form Faster Than Evidence

CBRS in 2026: What Have We Learned? Panel Recap

Ambassador Steve Lang on WRC-27 and International Telecom Diplomacy

The Direct-to-Device Era: Panel Recap

2026 TPI Winter Spectrum Series: The Direct to Device Era

TPI Comments Warn FCC Space Licensing Reforms May Worsen Congestion Without Market Mechanisms

TPI Proposes Market-Based Auction to Consolidate Rural Carriers and Reduce USF Costs

Sign Up for Updates

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.