Research Papers
Internet Peering and Transit
The Internet has evolved from four university mainframes connected by 64-kilobit lines…
Measuring Internet Performance when Broadband is the New PSTN
As we consider the transition from the telephony PSTN to broadband as…
Empowering Internet Users to Manage Broadband Consumption
It’s time to empower Internet users with bandwidth consumption transparency. Users have…
Know Your Limits
Usage–‐based pricing, today most commonly encountered in the form of data caps,…
How to Create a More Efficient Broadband Universal Service Program by Incorporating Demand and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
The existing high-cost fund suffers from two inherent flaws: it does not incorporate how much consumers value the services being subsidized, and does not measure the incremental, rather than average, effects of the program. This paper proposes a way to incorporate those factors into the Connect America Fund�the proposed high-cost broadband support program�to enable it to operate more efficiently than the existing high-cost program ever could.
Revised articles from TPI conference “Antitrust and the Dynamics of Competition in High-Tech Industries” Review of Industrial Organization
Attachments Antitrust and the Dynamics of Competition in High-Tech Industries
The Illusory Privacy Problem in Sorrell v. IMS Health
Those in the habit of looking for privacy invasions can find them everywhere. This phenomenon is on display in the recent news coverage of Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc., a case currently under review by the Supreme Court. The litigation challenges a Vermont law that would limit the dissemination and use of prescription drug data for the purposes of marketing to physicians by pharmaceutical companies. The prescription data at issue identify the prescribing physician and pharmacy, but provide only limited detail about the patients (for example, the patient�s age in years and gender). Nevertheless, privacy organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) have filed amici curiae briefs sounding distress alarms for patient privacy. A recent New York Times article describes the case as one that puts the privacy interests of “little people” against the formidable powers of “Big Data.” The fear is that, in the information age, data subjects could be re-identified using the vast amount of auxiliary information available about each of us in commercial databases and on the internet.
Applications Want to be Free: Privacy Against Information
Applications Want to be Free: Privacy Against Information