All Publications


Refine Your Search
Reset
Reset

The End or the Means? The Pursuit of Competition in Regulated Telecommunications Markets

Economic analysis takes as its defining performance benchmark the pursuit of increases in welfare (efficiency). Competition is merely one of a variety of means of achieving the efficiency end, especially in industries where the underlying economic circumstances predispose them towards greatest efficiency when competition (in the form of many market participants) is restricted. Typically, regulatory intervention in these industries is justified by the imperative to increase efficiency. Competition law and industry-specific regulation provide two competing means of intervention whereby the pursuit of efficiency can be enhanced. The challenge is in determining how to allocate responsibility for governance of industry interaction between these two institutional forms. Whilst competition law can govern interaction in most industries, where the underlying economic conditions are sufficiently different, industry-specific regulation offers advantages. However, its weakness is the risk of capture, leading to the subjugation of the efficiency end to the pursuit of other objectives (e.g. competition – the means – as an end in itself). But if the regulatory institution could be bound in some way to pursue an efficiency objective, could the risk of capture be averted?

A Comparison of the Technology Policies of Barack Obama and John McCain

This comparison is drawn from and adheres closely to statements on the presidential candidates? websites.1 Both websites list technology among the issues most important to their campaigns. The comparison summarizes the candidates? views on key issues and highlights important similarities and differences.

Electricity Market Design and Infrastructure Investments by William Hogan

https://techpolicyinstitute.org/events/show/64.html

Powering the Future: Key Issues for the Next Administration by Tim Mount

Powering the Future

The Supply Challenge – How Can We Meet It? by David Owens

Powering the Future

Assessing Electricity Markets: (Slightly) Outside the (Economics) Box by Tim Brennan

Powering the Future

The Electricity Capacity Challenge: A View from The Energy Information Administration by Howard Gruenspecht

Powering the Future

The Role of Energy Efficiency by Kathy Brown

Powering the Future

RTOs Failed to Reduce Wholesale Power Costs

Washington, D.C.-Regional transmission organizations have not produced lower wholesale prices for electricity and the states in these RTOs have higher average prices than regulated states, according to a study released today by the Technology Policy Institute, a Washington-based think tank.

Evaluating the Effects of Wholesale Electricity Restructuring

Electric power is one of the last major regulated industries to undergo some form of ?liberalization.? One of the most important steps has been creating regional transmission organizations (RTOs) in major regions of the country. RTOs are independent non-profit entities that operate utility-owned transmission networks. They are intended to increase competition and efficiency in the market for wholesale power, which should lead to lower wholesale prices. This paper tests whether RTOs have, in fact, achieved this goal.

Refine Your Search

Filters
Reset
Reset

Get The Latest In Your Inbox

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign Up for Updates

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Secret Link